United States v. Faust
This text of 71 M.J. 360 (United States v. Faust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
CCA 20090080. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. HUMPHRIES, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012), APPELLANT SUFFERED MATERIAL PREJUDICE TO A SUBSTANTIAL RIGHT AS A RESULT OF THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, IN CHARGE V, SPECIFICATIONS 1 AND 2.
The portion of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals as to Charge V, Specifications 1 and 2, and the sentence is reversed. The decision of that court as to the remaining charges and specifications is affirmed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for further consideration in light of Humphries. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 M.J. 360, 2012 WL 4848937, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-faust-armfor-2012.