United States v. Faulkner

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: May 9, 2024
• Docket: 23-60306
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-60306 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60306 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ May 9, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Lakeith M. Faulkner,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:22-CR-141-1 ______________________________

Before Willett, Duncan, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Lakeith M. Faulkner appeals his guilty plea conviction and 62-month sentence for conspiracy to commit wire fraud. He argues that his counsel in the district court provided ineffective assistance prior to the guilty plea hearing and sentencing by failing to adequately investigate loss and restitution. He further asserts that his counsel failed to: request a downward

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-60306 Document: 60-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/09/2024

No. 23-60306

departure based on his diminished capacity, raise a certain challenge to the gross receipts sentencing enhancement, and provide evidence in support of the abuse of trust enhancement. Although Faulkner made allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel in a post-sentencing motion, the district court neither held a hearing nor issued a ruling on these issues. As a result, the record is not sufficiently developed to enable this court to “fairly evaluate” the merits of Faulkner’s ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal. United States v. Jones, 969 F.3d 192, 200 (5th Cir. 2020); see United States v. Aguilar, 503 F.3d 431, 436 (5th Cir. 2007). We therefore decline to consider Faulkner’s ineffective assistance claim at this time without prejudice to Faulkner’s right to raise that claim in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Jones, 969 F.3d at 200. AFFIRMED.