United States v. Farmer

513 F. App'x 257
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2013·No. No. 12-7988·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Farmer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The district court also granted Farmer a certificate of appealability in an earlier order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Farmer, No. 5:02-cr-00131-BO-1; 5:11-cv-00642-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Farmer, 513 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2013).

513 F. App'x 257 (United States v. Farmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related