United States v. Farain Robledo-Rivera
This text of 492 F. App'x 824 (United States v. Farain Robledo-Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Defendant-Appellant Robledo-Rivera appeals the district court’s sentence of 63-months incarceration for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Due to his 2004 conviction for robbery in Kentucky, the district court computed a 16-level enhancement for defendant’s prior “crime of violence” pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A). This court reviews de novo whether a prior conviction is a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b). See United States v. Gonzalez-Perez, 472 F.3d 1158, 1159 (9th Cir.2007).
The facts are known to the parties. Robledo-Rivera argues that the government has not proven its case because, in finding the sentence enhancement, the district court relied upon judicially-noticed documents that do not specifically cite the Kentucky robbery statute for which Roble-do-Rivera was previously convicted. The district court found this deficiency unavailing for three reasons: that (1) robbery always involves the actual or threatened use of force, (2) Kentucky has a single robbery statute, which articulates a “crime of violence,” and (3) robbery is generically enumerated as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 cmt. n. l(B)(iii)(2005). AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 F. App'x 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-farain-robledo-rivera-ca9-2012.