United States v. Familia

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

November 14, 1995

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


____________________


No. 95-1447 



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                                JUAN CONSORO FAMILIA,



                                Defendant, Appellant.


____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND


[Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                         __________________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Juan Consoro Familia on brief pro se.
            ____________________

            Sheldon  Whitehouse,  United   States  Attorney,  and  Kenneth  P.
            ___________________                                    ___________

        Madden, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
        ______


____________________


____________________



Per Curiam.  Defendant Juan Consoro Familia appeals
                      __________



            a district court order  that denied his motion to  reduce his



            sentence  for  lack  of  jurisdiction.   We  have  thoroughly



            reviewed  the record and the  parties' briefs on  appeal.  We



            conclude that the district court's analysis is correct, hence



            we  summarily affirm  on  the basis  of the  district court's
                          ______



            order.



                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
                 ________   ___


-2-