United States v. Falice
This text of 18 F. App'x 171 (United States v. Falice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Reginald Anthony Falice appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion, and his motion to recuse the district court judge. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss as to the denial of Falice’s § 2255 motion and affirm as to the remaining orders on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Falice, No. CR-98-244 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2001; Apr. 17, 2001; April 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. App'x 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-falice-ca4-2001.