United States v. Faitau
This text of 54 F. App'x 667 (United States v. Faitau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Pulemau Faitau appeals the 140-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Faitau contends that the district court improperly denied his request for a downward departure. We conclude that the district court, having granted the government’s request for a downward departure of six levels based on Faitau’s substantial assistance, recognized that it had discretion to further depart downwards and decided not to exercise that discretion. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision. See United States v. Tam, 240 F.3d 797, 805 (9th Cir.2001).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. App'x 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-faitau-ca9-2003.