United States v. Faison

214 F. App'x 346
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2007
Docket05-4608
StatusUnpublished

This text of 214 F. App'x 346 (United States v. Faison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Faison, 214 F. App'x 346 (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Leon Faison pled guilty to distributing “61.2 grams (net weight) of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base (“crack”).” (J.A.5). He received a mandatory minimum ten-year sentence under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A) (West 2000 & Supp.2005). On appeal, Faison argues that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The Government bears the burden of proving the quantity of drugs for which a defendant should be held accountable at sentencing. See United States v. Gilliam, 987 F.2d 1009, 1013 (4th Cir.1993). We find that the Government met its burden in Faison’ s case because he pled guilty, without reserving his right to challenge the amount for sentencing purposes, to an indictment that attributes a specific quantity of drugs to him. Id. Thus, we find no error under Booker as Faison admitted to the relevant drug amount by pleading guilty to the indictment in this case. Booker, 543 U.S. at 244, 125 S.Ct. 738.

Accordingly, we affirm Faison’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Edward B. Gilliam, Jr.
987 F.2d 1009 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 F. App'x 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-faison-ca4-2007.