United States v. Faircloth

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Faircloth

66 F. App'x 507

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2003·No. 03-6287·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Wesley Faircloth appeals the district court’s order authorizing the sale of real property pursuant to a fine in a criminal judgment imposed in 1996. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Faircloth, No. CR-95-72-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Wesley Faircloth appeals the district court’s order authorizing the sale of real property pursuant to a fine in a criminal judgment imposed in 1996. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Faircloth, No. CR-95-72-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Faircloth, 66 F. App'x 507 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

66 F. App'x 507 (United States v. Faircloth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.