United States v. Fabian

414 F. App'x 559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fabian. Read the opinion of the Court — 461 F. App'x 244
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2011·No. 10-1791·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jackie and Alan Fabian seek to appeal the district court’s order granting the Government’s emergency motion, clarifying that the final order of forfeiture did not extinguish the lien on a parcel of real property, and noting that contingent relief may be appropriate depending on the outcome of the collateral litigation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan *560 Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Fabians seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the Fabians’ motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fabian, 414 F. App'x 559 (4th Cir. 2011).

414 F. App'x 559 (United States v. Fabian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)
See v. City of Seattle
387 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1967)