United States v. Ezequiel Solis-Flores
This text of 580 F. App'x 556 (United States v. Ezequiel Solis-Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ezequiel Benjamin Solis-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction to review under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Solis-Flores argues that he was entitled to an additional one-point reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b) for acceptance of responsibility, even though he did not waive his appellate rights. The district court, however, already awarded the additional one-point reduction.
Solis-Flores also contends that the district court erred in applying a 16-level enhancement for a prior conviction of a felony crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). Although Solis-Flores conceded that the underlying conviction was a felony on its face, he now asserts that the facts supporting the conviction do not satisfy the requirements for the felony portion of the state statute. Wash. Rev.Code § 9A.46.020(2)(b). This amounts to a collateral attack on his prior conviction that may not be maintained at sentencing. United States v. Burrows, 36 F.3d 875, 884-85 (9th Cir.1994). The district court did not err in imposing the 16-level enhancement.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 F. App'x 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ezequiel-solis-flores-ca9-2014.