United States v. Ezequiel Rodriguez

472 F. App'x 696
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2012
Docket11-50354
StatusUnpublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 696 (United States v. Ezequiel Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ezequiel Rodriguez, 472 F. App'x 696 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ezequiel Rodriguez, Jr., appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The government contends that this appeal should be dismissed in light of the appeal waiver set forth in Rodriguez’s plea agreement. We decline to reach the issue of whether this appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, and instead affirm on the merits. See United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc).

Rodriguez contends that the district court erred by denying him relief under the safety valve provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. The district court’s finding that Rodriguez was ineligible for safety valve relief because he did not give the government all of the information that he had regarding the offense was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Alba-Flores, 577 F.3d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Alba-Flores
577 F.3d 1104 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Jacobo Castillo
496 F.3d 947 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ezequiel-rodriguez-ca9-2012.