United States v. Ezekor

311 F. App'x 695
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 2009
Docket08-20003, 08-20005
StatusUnpublished

This text of 311 F. App'x 695 (United States v. Ezekor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ezekor, 311 F. App'x 695 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Peter Osamudiamen Ezekor pleaded guilty to two separate indictments charging him with illegal reentry following a previous deportation and conspiracy to launder funds. Ezekor received concurrent sentences of 94 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. His cases have been consolidated for purposes of appeal. Ezekor argues that his convictions must be reversed because the district court erred in summarily denying his motion to dismiss the indictments based on a speedy trial violation.

“When a defendant enters a voluntary and unconditional guilty plea, the plea has the effect of waiving all nonjurisdictional defects in the prior proceedings.” United States v. Stevens, 487 F.3d 232, 238 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 336, 169 L.Ed.2d 236 (2007). The waiver applies to alleged speedy trial violations. United States v. Bell, 966 F.2d 914, 915 (5th Cir.1992). Thus, the Government’s contention has merit, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See id.

Ezekor has filed a motion requesting leave to file a pro se supplemental brief. He contends that his appellate counsel failed to raise important issues that were in dispute before the district court. Because Ezekor has no right to hybrid representation, his motion is DENIED. See United States v. Ogbonna, 184 F.3d 447, 449 & n. 1 (5th Cir.1999).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Clayton Bell
966 F.2d 914 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Anthony Alozie Ogbonna
184 F.3d 447 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 F. App'x 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ezekor-ca5-2009.