United States v. Eynon
This text of 148 F. App'x 627 (United States v. Eynon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Danny Eynon appeals his 188-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea conviction for two counts of distribution of more than five grams of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en [628]*628banc). See United States v. Hermoso-Garcia, 413 F.3d 1085, 1089-90 (9th Cir. 2005).
SENTENCE REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 F. App'x 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eynon-ca9-2005.