United States v. Everroad
This text of 111 F. App'x 928 (United States v. Everroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Mark Richard Everroad appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 108-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to commit bank robbery, armed bank robbery and use and carrying of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2113(a) and (d) and 924(c)(l)(A)(ii).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Everroad has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 F. App'x 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-everroad-ca9-2004.