United States v. Everette
This text of 134 F. App'x 181 (United States v. Everette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Wayne Everette appeals the sentence imposed upon him for his convictions for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Everette contends that the district court violated the Sixth Amendment by (1) determining the quantity of cocaine involved in Everette’s offense and (2) deciding that his role in the offense was supervisory. Because Everette did not challenge his sentences on these grounds in the district court, we grant a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-everette-ca9-2005.