United States v. Evans
This text of 60 F. App'x 697 (United States v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Tommie Lee Evans appeals the district court’s denial of his request to treat his untimely 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. Evans seeks to challenge his guilty-plea conviction and 211-month sentence for one count of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U. S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d).
The record reveals that Evans is now deceased. Accordingly, we dismiss Evans’ appeal as moot. Cf. United States v. Oberlin, 718 F.2d 894, 896 (9th Cir.1983) (stat[698]*698ing that death pending an appeal of right abates the prosecution from its inception, whereas death pending discretionary review results in dismissal); Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir.1991) (stating that appeal is moot if we are without power to grant habeas relief).
DISMISSED.1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F. App'x 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-evans-ca9-2003.