United States v. Eustach

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Eustach

568 F. App'x 267

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-7910·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Eustach appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration of his criminal judgment filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eustach, No. 4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 18 & Oct. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Eustach appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration of his criminal judgment filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eustach, No. 4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 18 & Oct. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Eustach, 568 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

568 F. App'x 267 (United States v. Eustach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.