United States v. Eusebio

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Eusebio

649 F. App'x 303

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2016·No. No. 15-8021·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yulissa Eusebio appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for [304] reconsideration of her 90-month sentence and the order denying her motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eusebio, No. 5:12-cr-00001-MFU-2 (W.D.Va. Oct. 28 & Dec. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yulissa Eusebio appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for [304] reconsideration of her 90-month sentence and the order denying her motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eusebio, No. 5:12-cr-00001-MFU-2 (W.D.Va. Oct. 28 & Dec. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Eusebio, 649 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

649 F. App'x 303 (United States v. Eusebio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.