United States v. Eusebio-Berroa

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Eusebio-Berroa

436 F. App'x 914

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 3, 2011·No. No. 10-15211·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Frank Schwartz, appointed counsel for Robert Eusebio-Berroa, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that coun[915] sel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eusebio-Berroa’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Frank Schwartz, appointed counsel for Robert Eusebio-Berroa, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that coun[915] sel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eusebio-Berroa’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Eusebio-Berroa, 436 F. App'x 914 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

436 F. App'x 914 (United States v. Eusebio-Berroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related