United States v. Eugene Tannenbaum
This text of 475 F.2d 28 (United States v. Eugene Tannenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, Eugene Tannenbaum, was convicted by a jury on two counts of willful misapplication of bank funds, 18 U.S.C. § 656, and three counts of making or causing false entries to be made in a bank ledger, 18 U.S.C. § 1005. Concurrent two year sentences were imposed on each count. On this appeal, Tannenbaum contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that: (1) a connection existed between the misapplication of the bank funds and his status as a bank officer and director, and (2) the entries on the bank ledger were false entries within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1005. Having carefully reviewed the record in this case, we find that the jury was properly instructed as to the elements of each offense and that its verdict was amply supported by the evidence. If we were to uphold Tannenbaum’s contentions on the facts of this ease, the criminal statutes involved would become nullities.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F.2d 28, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eugene-tannenbaum-ca5-1973.