United States v. Eugene Szymanski, Gjon Gojcaj, Shtjefan Juncaj, Luvigj Juncaj, Djelosh Nuclolvic, and Charles Walker

872 F.2d 1030, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5432
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 1989
Docket87-2123
StatusUnpublished

This text of 872 F.2d 1030 (United States v. Eugene Szymanski, Gjon Gojcaj, Shtjefan Juncaj, Luvigj Juncaj, Djelosh Nuclolvic, and Charles Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eugene Szymanski, Gjon Gojcaj, Shtjefan Juncaj, Luvigj Juncaj, Djelosh Nuclolvic, and Charles Walker, 872 F.2d 1030, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5432 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

872 F.2d 1030

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eugene SZYMANSKI, Gjon Gojcaj, Shtjefan Juncaj, Luvigj
Juncaj, Djelosh Nuclolvic, and Charles Walker,
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 87-2123, 88-1324, 87-2133, 87-2152, 87-2153, 87-2155
and 87-2156.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 25, 1989.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., KRUPANSKY, and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants-appellants, Eugene Szymanski, Gjon Gojcan, Shtjefan Juncaj, Luvigj Juncaj, Djelosh Nuclolvic and Charles Walker, have appealed from the entry of judgments of conviction entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, pursuant to the verdict of the jury, in which defendants were found guilty of conspiracy to distribute and/or distribution of controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 and/or 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841. Upon review of the appellants' assignments of error, the record in its entirety, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel, this court concludes that no reversible error was committed during the course of the criminal trial.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction entered by the district court pursuant to the jury's verdict is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 F.2d 1030, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eugene-szymanski-gjon-gojcaj-shtje-ca6-1989.