United States v. Eugene P. Kent

129 F.3d 122, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 37179
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Eugene P. Kent. Read the opinion of the Court — 209 F.3d 1073
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1997·No. 97-1587·Unpublished

Opinion

129 F.3d 122

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Appellee,
v.
Eugene P. KENT, Appellant.

No. 97-1587SD.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 20, 1997
Filed: October 30, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. [UNPUBLISHED]

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eugene P. Kent appeals his conviction for mail fraud and the sentence imposed by the district court. Kent raises several contentions related to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdict, the district court's denial of Kent's motion for new trial, and the district court's loss calculations and refusal to depart downward under the sentencing guidelines. Because the appeal involves a straightforward application of settled principles of law, a discussion of the issues will serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm Kent's conviction and sentence without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Eugene P. Kent, 129 F.3d 122, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 37179 (8th Cir. 1997).

129 F.3d 122 (United States v. Eugene P. Kent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.