United States v. Etter
76 M.J. 68, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 36
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 18, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0117/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 76 M.J. 68 (United States v. Etter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Etter, 76 M.J. 68, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 36 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20150422. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to withdraw the petition for grant of review without prejudice, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied for lack of compliance with Rule 21(f), Rules of Practice and Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 68, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-etter-armfor-2017.