United States v. Ethel Delores Davis

967 F.2d 592, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24218, 1992 WL 159470
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 1992
Docket91-50363
StatusUnpublished

This text of 967 F.2d 592 (United States v. Ethel Delores Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ethel Delores Davis, 967 F.2d 592, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24218, 1992 WL 159470 (9th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

967 F.2d 592

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ethel Delores DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-50363.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 4, 1992.
Decided July 10, 1992.

Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Ethel Davis appeals the district court's revocation of her probation. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Davis was required as a term of her probation to serve six months in a community treatment center ("CTC"), as well as to follow the rules and regulations imposed by the Probation Department. One of these rules was to follow the rules of the CTC, which required a subsistence payment of 25% of gross monthly income. Davis failed to make the subsistence payments. She also repeatedly failed to show indigency.

We find no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision to revoke probation. See United States v. Daly, 839 F.2d 598, 599 (9th Cir.1988).

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Daniel Michael Daly
839 F.2d 598 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
967 F.2d 592, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24218, 1992 WL 159470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ethel-delores-davis-ca9-1992.