United States v. Estrada-Olivares
This text of United States v. Estrada-Olivares (United States v. Estrada-Olivares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40097 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN MIGUEL ESTRADA-OLIVARES,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-361-1 -------------------- October 29, 2001
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Miguel Estrada-Olivares (Estrada) appeals his guilty-
plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Estrada contends that the district
court erred in ordering his federal sentence to run
consecutively, rather than concurrently, to his undischarged
state sentence. Estrada’s argument is foreclosed by our decision
in United States v. Reyes-Lugo, 238 F.3d 305, 308-09 (5th Cir.),
cert denied, 121 S. Ct. 2232 (2001). Estrada, nevertheless,
seeks to preserve the issue for review by the Supreme Court.
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Estrada-Olivares, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-estrada-olivares-ca5-2001.