United States v. Esteban-Mendez

9 F. App'x 777
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2001
DocketNo. 00-10543; D.C. No. CR-00-798-PGR
StatusPublished

This text of 9 F. App'x 777 (United States v. Esteban-Mendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Esteban-Mendez, 9 F. App'x 777 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Julio Esteban-Mendez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U .S.C. § 1326(a). Esteban-Mendez’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that there are no non-frivolous grounds to appeal. Esteban-Mendez did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998) (waiver of right to appeal is valid if knowing and volutary), we enforce the waiver, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F. App'x 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-esteban-mendez-ca9-2001.