United States v. Estate of Marston G. Slate, Deceased

425 F.2d 1208, 25 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 959, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9985
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 3, 1970
Docket28814_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 425 F.2d 1208 (United States v. Estate of Marston G. Slate, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Estate of Marston G. Slate, Deceased, 425 F.2d 1208, 25 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 959, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9985 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

The opinion of the District Court in this case is published at 304 F.Supp. 380 (1969).

From 1952 to 1963, inclusive, Dr. Marston G. Slate filed no federal income tax returns. On September 12, 1964, he was killed in an airplane accident. His widow was appointed Administratrix of his estate.

The Government filed with the Probate Court of Harris County, Texas, a claim against the estate for income and other taxes. The Administratrix took no action on the claim, which, under Texas law, was tantamount to its rejection. The United States then brought suit in the District Court for the Southern District of Texas to recover judgment in personam for the various unpaid taxes, including penalties and interest. The estate moved for dismissal on the ground that the District Court was without jurisdiction because the claim had first been filed in the state court.

We adopt the opinion of the District Court as published (denying the dismissal), and we affirm the judgment below.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tercero v. TX Southmost Coll Dist
989 F.3d 291 (Fifth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Augspurger
452 F. Supp. 659 (W.D. New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 F.2d 1208, 25 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 959, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-estate-of-marston-g-slate-deceased-ca5-1970.