United States v. Espinoza-Hernandez

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: April 25, 2003
• Docket: 02-20445
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-20445 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PAULO CESAR ESPINOZA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-900-ALL --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paulo Cesar Espinoza-Hernandez (“Espinoza”) appeals the

sentence following his guilty plea for illegal reentry into the

United States following deportation. Espinoza argues that his

prior conviction for possession of cocaine is not an aggravated

felony under the November 1, 2001, Sentencing Guidelines

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C).

Espinoza’s arguments regarding the definitions of “drug

trafficking offense” and “aggravated felony” are foreclosed by

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-20445 -2-

our decision in United States v. Caicedo-Cuero, 312 F.3d 697,

705-11 (5th Cir. 2002), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Mar. 19,

2003) (No. 02-9747). Accordingly, the district court did not err

in assessing the eight-level upward adjustment.

AFFIRMED.