United States v. Eshleman

101 F. App'x 254

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: June 18, 2004
• Docket: No. 03-10559; D.C. No. CR-02-00532-SOM/KSC
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Michael S. Eshleman appeals his bench trial conviction and sentence for assault, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Eshleman has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Eshleman has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.