United States v. Escoffery

572 F. App'x 213
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7942
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 572 F. App'x 213 (United States v. Escoffery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Escoffery, 572 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Jerome Escoffery appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Escoffery, No. 5:98-cr-00126-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Addaquay
807 S.E.2d 413 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
The STATE v. ADDAQUAY
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 F. App'x 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-escoffery-ca4-2014.