United States v. Erwin
This text of 779 F.3d 620 (United States v. Erwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The petition for rehearing filed by appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel and the Court en banc, is denied.
Judges Rendell, Ambro, Greenaway, and Vanaskie would have granted the petition for rehearing en banc.
OPINION SUR REHEARING
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
779 F.3d 620, 2014 WL 8098931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-erwin-ca3-2014.