United States v. Erwin Alvarado

478 F. App'x 473
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2012·No. 11-10622·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Erwin Alvarado appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. *474 § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Alvarado contends that the district court erred by not sua sponte granting him a third-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. He argues that the reason cited by the government for refusing to make the motion for the reduction, that he reserved his right to appeal, is an impermissible reason under U.S.S.G. § 3E 1.1(b). As Alvarado concedes, this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Johnson, 581 F.3d 994, 1002 (9th Cir.2009), where we held that the expenditure of resources in anticipating and preparing for an appeal is an appropriate consideration under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b). '

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Erwin Alvarado, 478 F. App'x 473 (9th Cir. 2012).

478 F. App'x 473 (United States v. Erwin Alvarado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Johnson
581 F.3d 994 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)