United States v. Ervin Lee Franklin

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Ervin Lee Franklin

5 F.3d 1383, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26680, 1993 WL 407382

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 13, 1993

Docket91-8989

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.3d 1383 (United States v. Ervin Lee Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ervin Lee Franklin, 5 F.3d 1383, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26680, 1993 WL 407382 (11th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Appellant’s and appellee’s joint motion for withdrawal of the September 22, 1992 opinion, published at 972 F.2d 1253, is granted.

Appellant’s and appellee’s joint motion for an order affirming appellant’s conviction, vacating appellant’s sentence and remanding for resentencing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), with instructions that the district court not apply the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), is granted.

Appellant’s and appellee’s joint motion that the appellee’s petition for rehearing be denied as moot is granted:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

Appellant’s and appellee’s joint motion for withdrawal of the September 22, 1992 opinion, published at 972 F.2d 1253, is granted.

Appellant’s and appellee’s joint motion for an order affirming appellant’s conviction, vacating appellant’s sentence and remanding for resentencing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), with instructions that the district court not apply the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), is granted.

Appellant’s and appellee’s joint motion that the appellee’s petition for rehearing be denied as moot is granted:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F.3d 1383, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26680, 1993 WL 407382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ervin-lee-franklin-ca11-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack