United States v. Erskine

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Erskine

713 F. App'x 997

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 27, 2018·No. No. 16-11665 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Erskine, 713 F. App'x 997 (11th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

713 F. App'x 997 (United States v. Erskine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related