United States v. Errol B. Resnick
Opinion
The petition for rehearing of appellant Carlton is denied.
With respect to the search and seizure at Kennedy Airport, our opinion, 455 F. 2d 1127, concluded that the motion to suppress was properly denied. The government now concedes that if the government seeks a retrial of those defendants whose convictions are reversed, the trial court should consider whether the search and seizure at Kennedy was tainted by any illegal- search in Florida. In view of this concession, with which we agree after reexamination of the record, our opinion is modified accordingly. 1 In all other respects the petitions for rehearing of appellants Resnick and Simpson are denied.
No member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, FRAP; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) all petitions for rehearing en banc are denied.
. Appellant Davis did not file a petition for rehearing. However, in the event of his retrial he should be extended the benefit of the government’s concession.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
459 F.2d 1390 (United States v. Errol B. Resnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.