United States v. Ernie Hernandez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 2018
Docket17-50098
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ernie Hernandez (United States v. Ernie Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ernie Hernandez, (9th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-50098

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:16-cr-00101-R

v. MEMORANDUM* ERNIE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2018**

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The government appeals Ernie Hernandez’s 72-month sentence, which was

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent

to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine after being convicted of a felony

drug offense, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii); 846. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate and remand for resentencing.

The government argues, and Hernandez concedes, that the district court

erred in sentencing Hernandez to a prison term below the 20-year mandatory-

minimum sentence. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) (providing that a defendant

who violates section 841(a) “after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has

become final . . . shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be

less than 20 years”). We agree. This statutory minimum is mandatory, see United

States v. Sykes, 658 F.3d 1140, 1146 (9th Cir. 2011), and Hernandez is not eligible

for any of the exceptions to the mandatory minimum, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), (f).

Accordingly, on remand, the district court must impose a sentence of at least 240

months’ imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii); Sykes, 658 F.3d at

1146.

VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.

2 17-50098

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sykes
658 F.3d 1140 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ernie Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ernie-hernandez-ca9-2018.