United States v. Ernestine Audry James, AKA Ernestine James

156 F.3d 1344, 98 Daily Journal DAR 10868, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7716, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 25457, 1998 WL 723965

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ernestine Audry James, AKA Ernestine James. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 F.3d 1183 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 9, 1998·No. 96-30081·Published

Opinion

ORDER

HUG, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. James, 139 F.3d 748 (9th Cir.1998), is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ernestine Audry James, AKA Ernestine James, 156 F.3d 1344, 98 Daily Journal DAR 10868, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7716, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 25457, 1998 WL 723965 (9th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

156 F.3d 1344 (United States v. Ernestine Audry James, AKA Ernestine James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. James

139 F.3d 748 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Opinion

Related