United States v. Ernest Wilcox
This text of 146 F. App'x 860 (United States v. Ernest Wilcox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ernest Alphonzo Wilcox appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed following his guilty plea to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On appeal, Wilcox argues that the district court erred in not granting him a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12 (coercion and duress), and in not treating two March 8, 1988 state second-degree theft convictions, for which Wilcox received concurrent 5-year prison terms, as a single prior conviction for purposes of calculating his criminal history score.
We conclude that the district court’s discretionary decision to deny Wilcox’s downward-departure request is unreviewable, see United States v. Mohr, 407 F.3d 898, 902 (8th Cir.2005), and that the district court did not err in concluding that Wilcox’s two theft convictions were not related, see U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2), comment. (n.3); United States v. Newsome, 409 F.3d 996, 998-99 (8th Cir.2005) (standard of review), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Sept. 6, 2005) (No. 05-6240).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 F. App'x 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ernest-wilcox-ca8-2005.