United States v. Ernest W. Clark
This text of 337 F.2d 382 (United States v. Ernest W. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
337 F.2d 382
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Ernest W. CLARK, Appellant.
No. 14519.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 5, 1964.
Decided Oct. 29, 1964.
John M. Bader, Wilmington, Del. (Bader & Biggs, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellant.
Stanley C. Lowicki, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wilmington Del. (Alexander Greenfeld, U.S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER, GANEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of sentence entered pursuant to the jury's verdict will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
337 F.2d 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ernest-w-clark-ca3-1964.