United States v. Erik Mercado-Arechiga
This text of 429 F. App'x 634 (United States v. Erik Mercado-Arechiga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
The district court did not err in concluding that Mercado-Arechiga’s prior burglary conviction under California Penal Code § 459 was a crime of violence as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 16, which renders an individual statutorily ineligible for voluntary departure. See United States v. Becker, *635 919 F.2d 568, 573 (9th Cir.1990). Becker remains good law and we are bound by it. Thus, because Mercado-Arechiga was ineligible for voluntary departure, he did not suffer prejudice from the IJs’ failure to advise him of his eligibility to seek such relief.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 F. App'x 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-erik-mercado-arechiga-ca9-2011.