United States v. Erick Lopez

397 F. App'x 338
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 2010
Docket09-10326
StatusUnpublished

This text of 397 F. App'x 338 (United States v. Erick Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Erick Lopez, 397 F. App'x 338 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Erick David Lopez appeals from his conviction and 360-day sentence for being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(A), and for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*339 Lopez seeks to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of a firearm discovered during a traffic stop. The government contends that Lopez’s appeal is moot because he stipulated that he possessed a firearm which in turn formed the basis of his conviction. Giving Lopez the benefit of the doubt that his appeal is not moot, see United States v. Larson, 302 F.3d 1016, 1020-22 (9th Cir.2002) (discussing when an appeal may be moot following a stipulation), we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Lopez’s motion to suppress, see United States v. Wallace, 213 F.3d 1216, 1220 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ruel Antonio Wallace
213 F.3d 1216 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Lawrence O. Larson, Jr.
302 F.3d 1016 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 F. App'x 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-erick-lopez-ca9-2010.