United States v. Erick Gibbs

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Erick Gibbs. Read the opinion of the Court — 897 F.3d 199
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2018·No. 17-4037·Published

Opinion

FILED: September 14, 2018

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-4037

(7:13-cr-00110-F-1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. ERICK JEMONTA GIBBS Defendant - Appellant

ORDER

Appellant filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.

On the petition for panel rehearing, Judge Niemeyer and Judge Agee voted to deny rehearing, and Chief Judge Gregory voted to grant rehearing.

On a poll of the court requested by a judge, the majority of active judges voted to deny the appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Motz, Traxler, Duncan, Agee, Keenan, Diaz, Floyd, Thacker, Harris and Richardson voted to deny rehearing en banc; Chief Judge Gregory and Judge King voted to grant rehearing en banc; and Judge Wynn voted to vacate the panel opinion. * Opinions supporting the order and dissenting from it will be filed later.

Entered at the direction of Judge Niemeyer.

For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

*

The requested poll was completed before Judge Traxler took senior status on August 31, 2018. Judge Quattlebaum, who was commissioned as a circuit judge on September 4, 2018, and was advised of the poll, stated that to the extent his vote is required, he votes to deny rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Erick Gibbs, (4th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Erick Gibbs (United States v. Erick Gibbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.