United States v. Eric Singleton

632 F. App'x 307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 29, 2016
Docket15-2152
StatusUnpublished

This text of 632 F. App'x 307 (United States v. Eric Singleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eric Singleton, 632 F. App'x 307 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal prisoner Eric Singleton appeals the district court’s 1 order, entered after a hearing, committing Singleton for mental health care or treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245. Following careful review of the record, which included a treating psychologist’s report containing the opinion that Singleton met the criteria for commitment, we conclude the district court’s finding that Singleton was then in need of hospitalization for care or treatment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and is not clearly erroneous. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d) (burden of proof); United States v. Bean, 373 F.3d 877, 879 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

1

. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael J. Bean, Jr.
373 F.3d 877 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 F. App'x 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eric-singleton-ca8-2016.