United States v. Ereme

380 F. App'x 355
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ereme. Read the opinion of the Court — 339 F. App'x 340
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2010·No. 09-7575·Unpublished

Opinion

*356 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Thad Ereme was sentenced to 144 months in prison after a jury convicted him of conspiracy to dispense, distribute and possess with intent to distribute Schedule II controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006), and several counts of unlawfully dispensing-various Schedule II controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006). After the district court denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion, the district court granted Ereme’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Ereme v. United States, Nos. 8:02-cr-00478-PJM-2; 8:08-cv-00671-PJM, 2009 WL 2225997 (D. Md. filed July 22, 2009; entered July 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ereme, 380 F. App'x 355 (4th Cir. 2010).

380 F. App'x 355 (United States v. Ereme) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related