United States v. Epting

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2007·No. 06-51452·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 29, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51452 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LOY KYLE EPTING,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-142-1 --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Loy Kyle Epting has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Epting has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the counsel’s brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Epting, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Epting (United States v. Epting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)