United States v. Epps
This text of 89 F. App'x 627 (United States v. Epps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Epps appeals his second jury trial conviction and the sentence imposed for distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Epps acknowledges that his contention that the federal drug statutes are unconstitutional following Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) is foreclosed by United States v. Buckland, 289 F.3d 558, 562 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc). Nor did the term of supervised release imposed by the district court violate Apprendi, because Epps’s sentence does not exceed the prescribed statutory maximum pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). United States v. Sua, 307 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir.2002).
Accordingly, Epps’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 F. App'x 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-epps-ca9-2004.