United States v. Enrique Silva-Ramirez, AKA Jara Martin AKA Enrique Silva-Ramires AKA Enriquez Ramirez Silva

108 F.3d 1387, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9232, 1997 WL 119470
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1997
Docket96-50235
StatusUnpublished

This text of 108 F.3d 1387 (United States v. Enrique Silva-Ramirez, AKA Jara Martin AKA Enrique Silva-Ramires AKA Enriquez Ramirez Silva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Enrique Silva-Ramirez, AKA Jara Martin AKA Enrique Silva-Ramires AKA Enriquez Ramirez Silva, 108 F.3d 1387, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9232, 1997 WL 119470 (9th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

108 F.3d 1387

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Enrique SILVA-RAMIREZ, aka Jara Martin; aka Enrique
Silva-Ramires; aka Enriquez Ramirez Silva,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-50235.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 1997.*
Decided March 14, 1997.

Before: SNEED, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Enrique Silva-Ramirez appeals his conviction by conditional guilty plea and the sentence imposed for illegal reentry by a previously departed aggravated felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, contending he was entitled to national discovery regarding prosecution of illegal reentry cases. We affirm the district court because this contention is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. Candia-Veleta, 104 F.3d 243 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Candia-Veleta
104 F.3d 243 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 F.3d 1387, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9232, 1997 WL 119470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-enrique-silva-ramirez-aka-jara-mar-ca9-1997.