United States v. Enrique Maldonado Pineda

224 F. App'x 889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Enrique Maldonado Pineda. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 F. App'x 772
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 16, 2007·No. 06-12812·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Enrique Maldonado Pineda appeals his 169-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine and more than 500 grams of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine. Pineda argues that he received an unreasonable sentence because the district court failed to consider properly the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Pineda also argues that, upon remand, this Court should order a new judge to preside over his sentencing hearing because the earlier judge failed to fairly consider the factors under Section 3553(a).

In sentencing Pineda, the district court considered his arguments for a sentence below his applicable guideline range based on his personal characteristics and the nature of the offense, and considered the available sentences and appropriately consulted the Guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); United States v. Talley, 431 F.3d 784, 785-88 (11th Cir.2005). Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence upon Pineda.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Enrique Maldonado Pineda, 224 F. App'x 889 (11th Cir. 2007).

224 F. App'x 889 (United States v. Enrique Maldonado Pineda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. John Kevin Talley
431 F.3d 784 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)