United States v. Enrique Gomez-Gonzalez, AKA Jorge Cholico-Gomez

295 F.3d 990, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6000, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 7541, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 13153, 2002 WL 1420324
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 2, 2002·No. 01-10366·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Enrique Gomez-Gonzalez (“Cholieo”) has informed us that he completed his term of incarceration on October 16, 2001, one day after oral argument and approximately three months before we filed our opinion on January 15, 2002. Cholico’s appeal of his sentence became moot when he completed that sentence. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999). There was no case or controversy when we filed our opinion on January 15, 2002. See United States v. Mann, 138 F.3d 758, 758 (9th Cir.1997).

We DISMISS the petition for rehearing and request for en banc review, WITHDRAW the opinion filed January 15, 2002 and DISMISS the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Enrique Gomez-Gonzalez, AKA Jorge Cholico-Gomez, 295 F.3d 990, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6000, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 7541, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 13153, 2002 WL 1420324 (9th Cir. 2002).

295 F.3d 990 (United States v. Enrique Gomez-Gonzalez, AKA Jorge Cholico-Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ann Hunter
691 F. App'x 313 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Mamic
90 F. App'x 532 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)